Showing posts with label social issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label social issues. Show all posts

Friday, January 04, 2013

"Why Lesbians Marry" (Jet Magazine, January 1, 1953)

The following article appeared in JET Magazine on January 1, 1953



WHY LESBIANS MARRY

While lecturing in New York City on the causes of sex perversion, a Negro psychiatrist touched very perfunctorily on the advantages which homosexuals can find in marriage. A few days later, he received 11 letters, four of them from admittedly lesbian Negro women, asking for the names of men who would be willing to marry them. The letters were remarkably frank. The writers spoke freely of their sex tendencies, interests, ages, educations, occupations, ambitions. While they differed from each other on many points, the lesbians shared a common desire to find husbands - oddly enough, the more masculine, the better.

Their letters did not come as a shock to the psychiatrist, who had counseled many sex deviates during his career. Nor were their reasons for wishing to marry unfamiliar. Psychiatrists who have dealt with the problems of homosexuals find that while each must be handled as an individual, distinct case, broad conclusions can be reached about eh ability of some to adjust to marriage.

Obviously feminine men who flaunt their lack of masculinity by dressing and conducting themselves like women usually hold such an aversion for real women that marriage would appear to be a farce to them.  The same holds true for masculine women, to whom the idea of living with a man is revolting. But these "obvious' types only make up a small part of the homosexual population, counselors say.  They have found a large number of women and men who are homosexual, yet able to tolerate the opposite sex.  These people are really considered "bisexual," capable of interest in both men and women.  And these are the persons who often find that marriage is both satisfying and useful to them.

Typical is the case of the wife of the prominent Negro businessman in the South. She is known among her associates as a lesbian and often flaunts her beliefs openly in her crowd.  But to all appearances she maintains a happy home with her husband, despite her occasional lapses on her own side of hte sex line.

Although there are believed to be fewer lesbians than homosexual men, doctors who have studied female deviates say it is far easier for this group to marry than for male perverts to do so.  The woman's sexual role demands merely that she is compliant, but a man has to be capable of being aroused if he is to play his part.  Some lesbians have succeeded in hiding their perverted tendencies from men until they have married them - and sometimes for even longer.  Many become "good" wives, both in their husband's opinion and the public's.  Behind their determination is an appreciation for the "ad-

Psychiatrists Help Some Make Adjustments
vantages" which the New York doctor mentioned in his lecture: the personal companionship, security and protection from social hostility which they cannot find in any other relationship.

Frequently, lesbians seek psychiatric help to enable them to adjust to marriage.  Although there may always be some degree of bisexuality in their make-up, psychiatrists declare that it is possible in many areas to free the heterosexual elements in their characters and equip them to assume their normal role in life.  this is especially true of a woman to whom lesbianism is but a search for some new thrill.  These women often find deviation not as exciting as imagined nd return to normal sex relations.  Such a case is the wife of a Negro boxer, whose own philandering adventures drover her to thrill-seeking.  But she was caught with her female companion when her husband's suspicions were aroused.

Surprisingly, few lesbians wan to marry homosexual husbands, because by doing so they would destroy the very goal which they strive toward in marriage.  Such a union would offer them no "front," and little chance to acquire the self-confidence they desire.  Although the idea of bearing children is frightening to the majority of lesbians, there are some who try to adopt youngsters and are quite willing to rear them and love them in a throughly normal and maternal way.

Other lesbians enter marriage with the groundless hope that in it they will find escape from their aberration.  Counselors observe that these marriages rarely last, because when the lesbian discovers her mistake, her hostility towards her husband increases to the point where marriage is impossible.  There are cases on record in which lesbians have deserted their husbands, taken their children and moved back into their former girl friend's homes, there to live in apparent happiness ever after. 

Several cases have reached the courts in which husbands with lesbian wives sued women who "stole" their wives' affections.  Most recent case involved a Negro husband, who lived happily with his wife for 40 years and then lost her to another woman.  He filed a "love balm" suit.

Most deviants try hard to make a success of marriage, however, because they find it to be a bugger against loneliness and an assurance that at least one person can be depended upon to offer them companionship day after day and year after year.  not all of these women give up their lives of promiscuity, although some do.  Those who continue in it generally live in two worlds, one normal and one abnormal, with the silent prayer that never shall the twain meet.  Even though their adjustment to marriage may never be complete, it is an anchor and a bulwark, an institution which has its rewards for those masculine women who can assume its responsibilities.

Next Week in JET:

Why Musicians Choose White Wives
Ever since the roaring 20's when Negro jazz and its birth int he entertainment world, Negro musicians have continually found that their music has often led to romance.  In recent years, many top-flight Negro jazzmen have crossed the color line in increasing numbers to marry white brides.  Just why they do is told in a frank article in next week's JET.

The Seven Negro Wonders of the World
From ancient times to the present, people have marveled at the world's unique creations, both man-made and natural.  As "wonders" of civilization, however, few of them hnaev ever been identified with the Negro genius that went into their making.  JET, next week, in an illustrated feature, spotlights seven of these "wonders" attributed to Negroes and tells the little known story behind their creations.

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

LGBT Orgs: Where's the Love for MLK?





If you do a search for Reverend Martin Luther King and LGBT rights, you'll find a plethora of sites - some stating that Dr. King would have been in full support of LGBT equality and some stating that because he was a man of the cloth, Rev. King would have either not supported LGBT equality or he would have neglected to have an opinion either way.

Because Dr. King is no longer with us, the question has been posed to his widow and other family members. King's widow, Coretta Scott King, often spoke in support of LGBT equality stating: "Homophobia is like racism and anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry in that it seeks to dehumanize a large group of people, to deny their humanity, their dignity and personhood", she stated. "This sets the stage for further repression and violence that spread all too easily to victimize the next minority group." Mrs. King linked civil rights and LGBT equality at the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force's "Creating Change" conference and invited the Task Force to take part in the 40th anniversary of Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech. Mrs. King also publicly denounced a federal amendment proposed by then-president George W. Bush banning equal marriage rights for LGBT couples.



So, how has the most dynamic, impassioned and influential speaker on civil rights and his equally impassioned wife been honored by the LGBT community?

They haven't.

Not a dinner, not a commemorative video, not an award in his name - in most cases not even a mention on their websites!

Let's look at the very organization Coretta aligned herself with and invited to the 40th anniversary of King's famous "I Have a Dream" speech. According to Wikipedia, this was the first time an LGBT organization was invited to a national black event. How does the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force honor Coretta? It doesn't. There's been no mention of Coretta on the Task Force's website since she passed away in 2006. As for Dr. King, I expected to at least see a captioned picture on the front page but instead I saw only a banner ad of the Task Force's upcoming conference and further down, a link to a press release (dated January 17th, the day MLK Day was observed not even his actual birthday of January 15th) on how The Task Force acknowledges his birthday and his commitment to civil rights.

I'm disappointed.

Let's try GLAAD. I had to use the search feature on GLAAD's site to find anything about MLK and what I did find was relegated to the "Communities of Color" section. Interestingly enough, though, the headline is "Remembering Dr. King's Legacy" yet the blog entry has nothing to do with Dr. King and is nothing more than a veiled advertisement for a GLAAD show called "In the Life".

Let's try my local Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Center. The only mention of MLK on that site is to let visitors know it would be closed "in observance of Martin Luther King Day".

HRC? If not for this post by a guest blogger, there would have been no acknowledgment of MLK's birthday since a press release the HRC put out in 2008.

Freedom to Marry - no official acknowledgment but a press release announcing that executive director Evan Wolfson will be speaking at University of Michigan's MLK observance.

Need I go on?

The only LGBT groups I can find paying homage to the man who did so much for the betterment of others were the LGBT groups catering to the African American community. In my local area, the Jordan Rustin Coalition and Here to Stay organized an LGBT contingent in the Los Angeles Martin Luther King Day parade. The Here to Stay group was formed solely to galvanize LGBTs for the King Day parade to increase visibility in the African American community and to acknowledge Dr. King's commitment to civil rights. This is their 4th march.

There are few American leaders who did as much for civil rights as Martin Luther King. It's saddens me that organizations who claim that LGBT rights are the "Second Civil Rights Movement" don't do more to acknowledge a man who did so much for the first (and many argue only) one. For so many LGBT organizations to be so dismissive of Dr. King's legacy leads me to believe they haven't done their homework on how to galvanize disparate communities or honor leaders of the past. Hopefully in coming years, more local and national LGBT organizations will wake up and give Dr. King his due. Link

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

What the heck is wrong with Kramer?

Michael Richards needs a public relations person....stat!

I mean like poste haste, tout suite, expedimente!

If you haven't heard and I don't see how you couldn't have, Michael Richards (aka "Kramer" from the popular sitcom, SEINFELD) had a psychotic break over the weekend at the Laugh Factory after being heckled. He flipped out and started calling people the N-word and told the heclker "Fifty year's ago, you would have been hung up in a tree with a fork up your ass!"

and then went on Letterman to apologize saying that he was sorry to all the "Afro-Americans"

*sigh*

I reiterate: Michael Richards needs a public relations manager.

See, me? I would have had him go on Letterman and apologize and in the middle of the apology I would have had him drop a tear, not an Andrew Dice Clay tear, but a little choke up and then after a couple of seconds I would have had him utter the following phrase:

"Tito, pass me a tissue"

and THEN I'd have Tito Jackson himself come in frame left to bring him a tissue (wearing a tee shirt that said "I'm Tito Jackson" cuz nobody knows what the hell Tito Jackson looks like).


and in the middle of the apology, I'd have his cell phone ring and have it be Nelson Mandela and then Nelson would be satellited in and Nelson would say that he's known Michael for years, has prayed with him on ancient burial grounds and was at his baptism in the Nile and knows that Michael Richards is not capable of hate.


and all of this would happen while Michael wore a MLK tee shirt.

Yeah, that's what I'd do.

And I woulda told Michael that Black folks were only "Afro American" for about 3 days in 1981 and we never like to be called "Blacks" in racially volatile situations.

And I would have given him some lithium.

but since none of that happened....Michael Richards can kiss my ass.

The only person who can save him now is Oprah and she is not risking her rep for the likes of "Kramer".

And the Laugh Factory let him perform the NEXT night and then decided out of the blue to BAN him from the Laugh Factory pending an apology but then said the Letterman apolgy wasn't enough, he'd have to come BACK to the Laugh Factory, apologize to him (the owner) and the entire crowd. Ummmm, will you be charging $10 a head a two drink minimum for the controversial "Kramer" apology?

What Richards has done, though, is opened the door for discussions on race. Some of the conversations are old: "how come black people can say the n-word and white people can't" and some are not so old. I have constantly said that unless we incorporate multicultural history into junior high curriculuum, we will always have a problem with race in this country. 12 years of school and no one in your school books look like you (except Crispus Attucks ), that's not bound to do psychologically damage, oh no. And when all the "heroes" in the books are white, that doesn't give white kids a superiority complex, pu-shaw!

Most people in this country know nothing about The Middle Passage, Jim Crow, the Trail of Tears, Japanese internment camps, lynching, auction blocks or anything thing else that has contributed to our ethnic rage. Most folks think slavery was just about us picking up around White folk's houses, they don't know about auction blocks and rape. (Trust me, they don't, that's why they're so dismissive about it.) They also don't know how long slavery was, why slavery started in America or the fact that we're only 141 years out of slavery. Give most people, black or white, a pop quiz about Black history and they'd fail. I only know what I know because I made a point to research it and I'm still abashedly uninformed.

At some point during his interview, "Kramer" sounds like he's about to talk about the rage the lead him to the n-word, he doesn't get to it but I'd be interested in what he had to say actually. He can still kiss my ass but I'd like to know.

I'd like to know because on TMZ.com I was FLOORED by how many white folks had no problem with what "Kramer" said, no problem at all. They were glad somebody had said it and blamed the hecklers for opening their mouths (although I've been to a comedy club. On a date, entry for 2: $20; 2 drink mininum for both $36; tips: $12; appetizer: $15 - $83 into it and "Kramer" isn't funny???? OH HELL TO THE NAW!).

This country is begging for a conversation on race, I don't know through what medium or on whose terms but there's a storm a-brewin'.

On the "upside" though, I wish that someone would have corrected the news report that a black man stood up to "Kramer" and told him his comments were "un-fucking-necessary". The man yelling at Kramer is obviously (to me) Latino. In a city where there is so much Black/Brown tension, it's nice to know that one of the homies had our back.

Wednesday, July 05, 2006

Unlike India, I am my hair

So...the only other black woman on the floor told me yesterday that she got upset with someone recently who asked her why I wear my hair the way I do.

Apparently this unnamed person asked her why I don't wear my hair the way she does - straight and processed - to which she replied that she liked my hair and asked Unnmaed Person what was wrong with my hair.

"Well, it's not very professional" was the reply.

Interesting.

We work in an environment where jeans and baseball caps are the norm, curse like sailors and watch the World Cup throughout the day. Professional?

The software developers have abandoned their chairs for exercise balls because they're fun to roll around in but my hair is not professional?

Despite the fact that I wear 3 1/2" heels everyday, work entirely by myself and get all my work done, my hair belies my professionalism.

Whatever shall I do? Go get my hair "trained" by pressing it on a weekly basis or subject my hair to an array of chemicals so that I can then be "professional" in an environment that doesn't call for any?

I've worn my hair natural for almost exactly 10 years, it grows out my mf'in head this way and aside from those 3 years when it wanted to get real wavy on a sistah, it's always been thick and defiant...just like me.

I'm curious to who Unnamed Person is, I'd love to have a sit down with him about this "professionalism" thing and call on him to show me one "professional" thing not only in our office but in Hollywood as a whole where professional is relative. We're all still making movies and making moves and I still have a strong work ethic and motivation regardless of what my hair looks like. I'm still polite, work quickly and am willing to help wherever I'm needed. I speak to everyone in a respectful tone, show up on time and always look nice. My contract here has been extended repeatedly while other people who came in with me and before me have been terminated. I left for what I thought to be a better opportunity and within 24 hours was asked to come back.

My bad, I thought THAT was professionalism.

Monday, March 06, 2006

Femmes have a responsibility to the community

I had to do a guest lecture for my public relations class this past Saturday. I'd known about it since last Saturday and had briefly put together how I would structure the lecture in my head. It was a simple task really but I had to ask myself if in doing my lecture about my event planning ventures if I would reveal the TYPE of events I put together. I questioned this because my teacher is African and I feared his particular cultural bias and my class just split up into groups and I questioned whether or not my group would respond to me differently if they knew I was gay.

I was scheduled to do this lecture next Saturday but my teacher asked me if I could just do it this past Saturday instead. Ummm, sure, I guess.

I'd already decided that I'd talk about the fact that I throw parties for women because I felt that it really was integral to my presentation and because I didn't feel right "passing". (For those of you not familiar with the term, "passing" is what it's called when fair skinned Black people "pass" for White). Last year at Sistahfest, the question was raised if being a femme was a modern-day form of "passing" and at the time I didn't have an opinion one way or the other but I felt that this was one of those moments when as a femme had an obligation to speak up.

I don't have very many femme friends so most of my conversations with gay women are with those women whose sexual orientation is announced everytime they enter a room. In talking with them, I realized that their business is on the table everytime they go to the bank, a restaurant, get a cab or simply put one foot in front of the other. For them, every interaction can turn into a question of who and what they are and why they are what they are. As a femme, I have very few such experiences because assumptios are made about me based on my high heels. I choose who to tell and when to tell them. I have the luxury of sitting a person down and revelaing what's what if I feel safe enough to do so. Many of my other sistahs do not have that same luxury.

So, my second day in class, in front of my African teacher and my entire public relations class, I had a decision to make. I could take the "it's nobody's business" route or I could be honest explaining that I started throwing parties because I was disappointed with the lack of social options for queer women of color. I could go on to talk about how I had to use my original motivation of wanting to unite a disenfranchised community when things got really complicated and daunting.

or...

I could pretend that I was throwing events for a mixed crowd, leaving out key points and not entirely lie but tell an "untruth" just to get by.

So, I stood in front of these people and I said....

"In 2002, disappointed with the social options available for queer women of color, I decided to start a social, networking and activist organization for queer women of color..."

and they just blinked at me. In unison.

and then I got nervous because it was just out there but I continued on...and on..and on.

and they exhaled.

and they wow'd...and then they applauded.

And then they thanked me.

They asked lots of questions about what I was doing and they smiled at me with their eyes, genuine in their appreciation for lecture. The chick who sits in the front (who I KNEW was a dyke) asked for my website address and my African professor who said he called me a week early because he knew I'd set the bar high for the other guest lectures said that was he was genuinely impressed and asked me if I did any consulting.

Anyway, patting myself on the back aside, I would have felt like a traitor had I chickened out by "passing". I feel that if we as a community want to change how straight people look at us, we have to give them the opportunity to look at us, really look at us and see that we're in their classrooms, at their jobs and approving their loans. We come in a variety of shapes and sizes, in Tims and high heels, long hair and short.

Have you told anyone you're a dyke today?

Sorry this is so rushed, I wanted to get this out before I had to go....

Thursday, February 16, 2006

Why Adelphia Cable Hates Me...

Why Adelphia Cable hates me....


Last night, a telemarketer from Adelphia Cable called me tryna sell me something....at the time I was on the other line with LL C.J. threatenin' to get my boys on her (we got beef [[inside joke]]) so this interruption was most inconvenient.

Telemarker: Is Marquita home?

Me: No.

Telemarker: Does she have a husband I can speak with?

Me: No, she's a dyke.

Telemarker: (long pause.)

Telemarker: (angrily) Well, could you just have her call us, please?

Me: Sure.

I don't think they'll be offering me discounts on premium channels anytime soon.

I don't get offended easily but is it so wrong in 2006 to expect people to use a word like "spouse" instead of assuming I have a "husband"?